Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Lithosphere
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lithosphere; February 2009; v. 1; no. 1; p. 60-64; DOI: 10.1130/L10.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Arkansas crustal xenoliths: Implications for basement rocks of the northern Gulf Coast, USA

Dennis P. Dunn1

JACKSON SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78712, USA


Figure 01
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Geographic map of south-central United States. The location of the Prairie Creek lamproite province is shown in relation to selected tectonic features and to the lithospheric transect of Mickus and Keller (1992).

 

Figure 02
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Detailed crustal section beneath the Prairie Creek lamproite province. Section was modified from the lithospheric transect of Mickus and Keller (1992). Model is based on seismic and gravity surveys along the PASSCAL/COCORP transect shown in Figure 1. Calculated rock density in g/cm3 is shown in parenthesis.

 

Figure 03
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Simplified lithospheric transect model (Mickus and Keller, 1992). The approximate location of the Prairie Creek lamproite province is indicated. O/T indicates oceanic transitional crust. Calculated rock density in g/cm3 is shown in parentheses.

 

Figure 04
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Idealized basement geology for the Ouachita aulacogen model. Map is modified from Proterozoic geology of the western midcontinent basement (Van Schmus et al., 1986).

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America